06 June 2011

quick revision links

The purpose of mediocratic ideology is the same as that of Marxist ideology: to make life impossible for genuine intellectuals, i.e. those who might generate real cultural progress. To mask the issue, an ersatz system of high culture has been built up, designed to perpetuate and reinforce the ideology, and to ensure no assistance is given to those whom the system carefully excludes.



Assange, Julian
.
Bourgeoisie and aristocrats
.
Civil war (state vs. non-state)
.
d’Ancona, Matthew
.
Everyone is equally intelligent”
.
Fukushima, biased and/or pretentious analyses
.
Grant application


Herbal medicine
.
Internet vs. traditional publishing
.
Jokes, now deceased & off the twig
.
Kazuo Ishiguro
.
Libraries, dismantling of
.
Massive Attack


Not humanities as we knew them
.
Oxford University and deflating gasbags
.
Physics and antiphysics
.
Quentin Lumsden
.
Riots, academic
.
Stephen Fry


Television comedy
.
University expansion vs. contraction
.
Voting systems
.
Women on boards
.
X-rated speech
.
Yanks and their sensibilities
.
Zero tolerance of misspelling



aphorism of the month:

It is superfluous to be humble on one’s own behalf; so many people are willing to do it for one.
Celia Green, The Decline and Fall of Science



food for grey cells:

New particle contradicts standard theory?



The author of this blog is an unsalaried academic. Like his colleagues, he is excluded from the academic system because of the way that system is currently run. (The phrase “sausage factory” was recently used by a government minister, expressing part of the problem.) As a result, he is unable to write in detail about intellectual issues to which he could be contributing, and has to limit himself to brief blog comments.

We appeal to readers, who think that views not currently represented in the academic world
should receive expression, to do what they can to help Oxford Forum. Both Left and Right have their own vested interests which are incompatible with supporting unbiased research. Those who (whatever their own views) recognise the importance of impartial analysis, regardless of whether it buttresses prevailing fashions, should support our work.